Subaru class action: the WRX engine lawsuit and who could get paid
A Subaru class action says WRX and WRX STi engines fail early. See what it claims, why Subaru is appealing and why there's nothing to claim yet.

Short answer: The Subaru class action that Owed's Subaru page tracks is Amato v. Subaru of America, No. 1:18-cv-16118, a New Jersey federal case filed in 2018 over the engines in 2009–2018 Impreza WRX and WRX STi cars. The owners say a piston ringland defect can wreck the engine, costs $5,000 to $6,500 or more to repair and was hidden by Subaru. Subaru is now appealing a November 24, 2025 order to the Third Circuit, no settlement has been announced, and nothing is available to claim yet. The separate Subaru EyeSight settlement stopped taking claims on September 27, 2025.
What the Subaru class action claims
The case is Amato et al. v. Subaru of America, Inc., No. 1:18-cv-16118, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, with Judge Karen M. Williams as the trial judge. A second suit, Aquino v. Subaru of America (No. 1:22-cv-00990), filed February 28, 2022, was consolidated with it. Both are proposed class actions against Subaru of America and Subaru Corporation.
The owners say the engines in 2009 through 2018 Subaru Impreza WRX and WRX STi cars have components that let the piston ringlands fail early. Ringlands are the narrow bands of a piston that hold its sealing rings. The complaint calls this the Piston Ringlands Defect and says it can wreck an engine and cost roughly $5,000 to $6,500 or more to fix. They also say Subaru knew and kept quiet. Their claims are state consumer-protection and misrepresentation claims, argued state by state.
These are allegations, not findings, and Subaru has not been found liable.
Who is in the proposed class
The suit is for people who bought or leased a 2009 through 2018 model-year Subaru Impreza WRX or WRX STi. The groups are built state by state, because each state's consumer law is different, and the named owners come from a handful of states. We could not confirm from public sources which state groups the court has certified, if any, so don't assume you're in one.
Other Subaru models aren't part of this case. A class only counts once a judge certifies it, and a certified class is defined by the judge, not by a law firm's web page. Our guide to what happens after a class action is certified explains that step.
Where the case stands
It's old and it's contested. The owners asked the court to certify classes on April 30, 2024, and Subaru opposed on July 15, 2024. On November 24, 2025 the district court issued an order that Subaru is now challenging in the Third Circuit. The two appeals, Nos. 26-1277 and 26-1328, were consolidated on February 20, 2026, and the briefs were in by mid-summer. The last filing we could see on the public docket was on August 5, 2026.
Subaru, not the owners, is the one appealing. Federal rules let an appeals court take an early appeal of a class-certification ruling if it chooses to. This appeal came in through a miscellaneous docket (No. 25-8041), and the owners had asked for certification in 2024, which suggests the order certified classes at least in part. We couldn't open the order to confirm that, so treat it as unconfirmed.
| Date | What happened |
|---|---|
| November 2018 | Amato class action filed in federal court in New Jersey |
| February 28, 2022 | Aquino class action filed, later consolidated with Amato |
| April 30, 2024 | Owners ask the court to certify classes |
| July 15, 2024 | Subaru files its opposition |
| November 24, 2025 | District court order that Subaru is now appealing |
| January 27, 2026 | Notice of appeal filed |
| July 17, 2026 | Subaru files its reply brief in the Third Circuit |
What could happen next, and how long it takes
The Third Circuit can uphold the order, reverse it or send it back to the trial court. Decisions often take several months after the briefs are in, and longer if the court schedules argument. Whatever happens, the case then returns to the trial court, where the sides can ask for judgment without a trial, settle, or go to trial. This case is already nearly eight years old, so patience is the realistic plan.
If it ends in a settlement, a judge has to approve it and notice has to go out before anyone can file a claim. For the general mechanics, see how a class action works from start to finish.
Could you get paid?
Not today. There is no fund, no claim form and no deadline. The owners seek money damages, but nothing has been decided. Engine-defect deals tend to look like Subaru's last big one: the EyeSight settlement extended warranty coverage and reimbursed 75% of the invoice for one covered repair, and you needed the repair paperwork to claim it.
That's why records matter now. If your WRX or WRX STi has had engine trouble, repair invoices, diagnoses and anything Subaru or a dealer paid are the evidence a future claim would ask for. See what counts as proof and how auto defect settlements usually pay.
How this differs from the Subaru EyeSight settlement
Searches for a Subaru class action often land on the EyeSight settlement, which is a different case. It covers certain 2013–2024 Subaru models with the EyeSight driver-assist system, not WRX engines. Per the official site, the court approved it in November 2025, the claim deadline of September 27, 2025 has passed, and payments follow once any appeals are resolved.
| Detail | WRX engine case (Amato) | EyeSight settlement (Sampson) |
|---|---|---|
| Problem | Piston ringlands failure in 2009–2018 WRX and WRX STi engines | EyeSight braking and lane-keep problems in certain 2013–2024 models |
| Status | Contested; Subaru appealing a Nov 24, 2025 order | Approved Nov 2025; payments after any appeals |
| Can you claim now? | No claim form exists | No; the Sept 27, 2025 claim deadline passed |
How to get notified if it settles
Settlement notices usually go to the email and mailing addresses in the company's or the dealer's records, so keep your contact details current with Subaru and your dealer. If a claim form opens, filing directly with the settlement administrator will be free. Our guide to getting notified of class action settlements covers the options.
Owed finds the settlements you may qualify for, explains them in plain English, opens the official claim form, reminds you before deadlines and tracks each claim to payout. You submit any claim yourself. Tap Notify me on Owed's Subaru page and Owed will email you if a settlement opens claims. Owed Pro is $2 for the first week, then $49 per year — one flat membership. Owed never takes a percentage of any payout. You can also take the eligibility quiz or browse open settlements you can claim now. This is general information, not legal advice. Owed isn't a law firm or a settlement administrator, and courts and administrators decide who qualifies and what they receive.
Glossary
- Piston ringlands
- The narrow bands of a piston that hold its sealing rings. The lawsuit says they fail early in WRX and WRX STi engines.
- Class certification
- The court ruling that lets a lawsuit go forward for a whole group of owners instead of only the named plaintiffs.
- Subclass
- A smaller group inside a class, often one state's buyers, because state consumer laws differ.
- Consolidated cases
- Separate lawsuits combined so one judge handles them together. Amato and Aquino are consolidated.
- Appellant
- The side asking an appeals court to change a lower-court ruling. In these appeals that is Subaru.
- EyeSight
- Subaru's camera-based driver-assist system. It is the subject of a different settlement.
FAQ
Yes, more than one. The one Owed tracks is Amato v. Subaru of America over 2009–2018 WRX and WRX STi engines. No settlement has been announced and there is no claim form.
The owners say a piston ringland defect makes WRX and WRX STi engines fail early, at a repair cost of $5,000 to $6,500 or more, and that Subaru knew and didn't tell buyers. Subaru has not been found liable.
Not in the cases covered here. The EyeSight settlement's claim deadline passed on September 27, 2025, and no settlement has been announced in the WRX engine case.
Subaru is challenging a November 24, 2025 order in the Third Circuit. The public docket doesn't say what the order decided, but the owners had asked the court to certify classes in 2024.
There's nothing to sign up for. If a class is certified and the case later settles, you'd get a notice or find a claim site, and you'd file a claim only then.
The suit covers 2009 through 2018 Subaru Impreza WRX and WRX STi vehicles. Other models, including those in the EyeSight settlement, are separate.
- Third Circuit docket — Joseph Amato v. Subaru of America Inc, No. 26-1277 (CourtListener)
- D.N.J. opinion in Aquino v. Subaru of America, Jan 11, 2024 (GovInfo)
- D.N.J. opinion and order in Amato and Aquino, Sept 26, 2024 (GovInfo)
- D.N.J. opinion in Amato v. Subaru of America, May 27, 2021 (GovInfo)
- Official Subaru EyeSight settlement website
This article is based on public information as of Oct 21, 2026; features, prices and deadlines change. Owed is not a law firm and nothing here is legal, tax or financial advice. Corrections →


