Settlements

Panda Express lawsuit: what it claims and who could get paid

A proposed class action says Panda Express receipts showed too many card digits. See what the Panda Express lawsuit claims, where it stands and what's next.

May 6, 2026lawsuit filed
10 digitsof a card number allegedly printed
No claim formno settlement exists yet
Was this article helpful?
Panda Express lawsuit: what it claims and who could get paid
Quick answer

Short answer: The Panda Express lawsuit is a proposed class action, not a settlement, so there is no money to claim and no claim form. Dawnisha Greer sued Panda Restaurant Group on May 6, 2026, saying her receipt printed ten digits of her debit card number when federal law allows only the last five. The case went to federal court and was sent back to Riverside County Superior Court on August 13, 2026. Nothing has been decided and no class has been certified. Owed can watch the case and tell you if it ever settles.

What the Panda Express lawsuit claims

The lawsuit is Greer v. Panda Restaurant Group, Inc., a proposed class action filed in Riverside County Superior Court in California on May 6, 2026. Panda Restaurant Group is the California company behind Panda Express. Greer lives in Arizona. She says that on or about March 1, 2026, she paid with her debit card at the Panda Express in Coachella, California, and her electronically printed receipt showed the first six and last four digits of her card number.

Her lawyers argue that ten digits is far more than the law permits and that Panda acted willfully or recklessly. Those are allegations. Panda has not been found to have done anything wrong, no court has ruled on the merits, and the company hasn't answered the complaint in any filing we could review. Its deadline to respond was put on hold while the court decided where the case belongs.

The receipt law behind the Panda Express lawsuit

The claim rests on the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, usually shortened to FACTA. Under 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g), a business that takes credit or debit cards can't print more than the last five digits of the card number, or the expiration date, on a receipt it gives you. The rule covers electronically printed receipts only; handwritten or imprinted ones are outside it.

For a willful violation, the statute lets a consumer recover actual damages or statutory damages of $100 to $1,000, plus punitive damages and attorney's fees. That per-person range is why receipt cases are filed as class actions. It doesn't mean anyone is owed that amount: nothing has been awarded or agreed here, and class settlements usually pay a fraction of the statutory maximum because the money is shared among many people.

Why the lawsuit says ten digits matters

The complaint spends several pages on why extra digits matter. It notes that FACTA gave merchants until December 4, 2006 at the latest to comply, nearly twenty years ago, and says card networks including Visa and Mastercard separately require receipts to show only the last four digits. On that view, a company of Panda's size can't claim it didn't know the rule.

It also argues that printing ten of 16 digits, about 62.5% of the number, makes it much easier for a thief who finds the receipt to guess the rest and commit fraud. Panda hasn't responded to those arguments in any filing we could review, and no judge has weighed them. They are the plaintiff's side of the story, which is why this article calls them allegations throughout.

See what you're owed in 30 secondsOne flat membership. Never a percentage of your payout.
Claim my money

Who could be in the proposed class

Greer wants to represent everyone in the United States who used a credit or debit card at any Panda restaurant at a time when its payment systems printed more than the last five digits on the receipt, within two years before the complaint was filed. That is a proposal, not a ruling. A judge has not certified any class, so nobody is officially "in" it yet, and there is nothing to sign up for.

If the case settles or a class is certified, the court would order notice to people who fit the definition, usually by email or mail. Until then, ignore any website or message offering to file a "Panda Express lawsuit claim" for a fee. Our guide to spotting settlement scams explains why.

Where the Panda Express case stands

The case took a detour. Panda moved it from state court to federal court, and Greer asked the federal judge to send it back. The judge agreed. Greer's request for attorneys' fees and costs was denied.

Panda Express lawsuit timeline
DateWhat happenedWhere
March 1, 2026Greer's alleged purchase and receiptCoachella, California
May 6, 2026Class action complaint filedRiverside County Superior Court
June 12, 2026Panda removes the case to federal court (5:26-cv-03279)U.S. District Court, Central District of California
June 25, 2026Greer asks to send the case backFederal court
August 13, 2026Judge George H. Wu grants the request and ends the federal caseFederal court
August 14, 2026Remand sent to Riverside Superior CourtBack in state court
NextPanda's response, possible motions, a case scheduleNot yet known

What could happen next, and how long it takes

From here, Panda has to respond in state court. It could answer the complaint, ask the judge to dismiss it, or negotiate. If the case survives, the plaintiff would then have to persuade the judge to certify a class. Defendants in receipt cases often argue that showing extra digits didn't actually harm the customer, and courts haven't all agreed on that, so a dismissal is a real possibility.

If the case does settle, it usually takes one to several years from filing, and many never get that far. Our explainers on how a class action lawsuit works and what happens after a class action is certified walk through the stages.

What you can do now

Right now, nothing needs filing, and Owed's Panda Express page will show any update. If you've paid with a card at Panda Express in the last couple of years and kept your receipts, hold on to them, because a settlement could ask which restaurant and date. Check one: if a receipt shows more than the last five digits of your card number, that's the kind of receipt the lawsuit is about.

To avoid missing a settlement, get alerts on cases you could be part of. Our guide on how to get notified of class action settlements lists the options, and you can browse open cases in the settlements directory. Owed tracks open cases, explains them in plain English and reminds you before deadlines. Owed Pro is $2 for the first week, then $49 per year — one flat membership. Owed never takes a percentage of any payout. See which settlements match you.

This article is general information, not legal advice. Only a court can decide whether anyone is owed money in this case.

Glossary

FACTA
The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, a federal law that limits how much of a card number can appear on a receipt.
Remand
A federal court sending a case back to the state court where it started.
Proposed class
The group of people a plaintiff wants to represent. It becomes a real class only if a judge certifies it.
Statutory damages
A set amount the law allows per person, here $100 to $1,000 for a willful violation, without proving a specific dollar loss.
Willful violation
Breaking the law knowingly or with reckless disregard of what it requires. The FACTA damages range applies to willful violations.

FAQ

No. The Panda Express lawsuit is a proposed class action that has not settled, so there is no settlement fund, claim form or deadline. Anyone offering to file a claim for you is not legitimate.

It says a Panda Express receipt printed ten digits of a customer's debit card number, the first six and last four, when the federal FACTA law allows only the last five. The claims are allegations that haven't been decided.

There is nothing to join yet. No class has been certified. If you used a card at a Panda restaurant and your receipt showed more than five digits, you might be a class member automatically if a class is certified or the case settles, and you would get notice.

Nothing has been awarded or agreed. The FACTA statute allows $100 to $1,000 per consumer for a willful violation, but class settlements usually pay far less per person.

That a business print no more than the last five digits of your card number, and no expiration date, on the receipt it gives you. It covers electronically printed receipts, not handwritten or imprinted ones.

It is back in Riverside County Superior Court after a federal judge sent it there on August 13, 2026. Panda's response and any next steps in state court aren't known yet.

Sources & further reading

This article is based on public information as of Oct 19, 2026; features, prices and deadlines change. Owed is not a law firm and nothing here is legal, tax or financial advice. Corrections →

Keep reading

★★★★★ 4.9 · 12,400+ reviews Get the money you're owed with Owed Get started
Saved