Settlements

Chobani lawsuit: what it claims and who could get paid

Chobani lawsuit explained: buyers say 32-oz 20G Protein tubs give about 18g, not 20g. No settlement or claim form exists yet. What it claims and what's next.

~18gprotein per serving the plaintiffs calculate, vs 20g on the label
5 suitsfiled over the 32-oz 20G Protein tubs since June 2026
Nonemoney available now: no settlement, fund or claim form
Was this article helpful?
Chobani lawsuit: what it claims and who could get paid
Quick answer

There is no Chobani settlement and nothing to claim yet. The Chobani lawsuit covered here, Lombardo v. Chobani, is a proposed class action that a New York federal judge has folded into a consolidated case, In re Chobani Serving Size Litigation. The plaintiffs say the 32-ounce "20G Protein" yogurt tubs deliver about 18 grams of protein per serving, not the 20 grams on the label, because Chobani sets an inflated serving size. No money is available, Chobani has not been found liable, and no class has been certified.

It is one of several suits over the same tubs, and a separate case over Chobani's "Zero Sugar" yogurt is also in the news. See Owed's Chobani case page for the current status.

What the Chobani lawsuit claims

Chobani introduced a "20G Protein" yogurt line in 2024, including a 32-ounce tub, and puts the 20-gram figure in the name and on the label. The plaintiffs in Lombardo v. Chobani LLC (No. 1:26-cv-07408, Southern District of New York) are Jamie Lombardo and Alexander Mercado. They say the tub doesn't deliver 20 grams in a correctly sized serving.

Their argument is about the serving size, not safety. The complaints don't claim the yogurt is unsafe. The single-serve 6.7-ounce cups aren't challenged. For the 32-ounce tub, the plaintiffs say FDA rules leave manufacturers little discretion, and that Chobani lists a larger serving than the rules allow, which lets each serving show more protein. Chobani has not been found liable.

Why would two grams matter? The complaints say 20 grams per serving has become a benchmark shoppers use to pick protein foods. They cite Chobani's own December 2024 survey, in which 85% of Americans said they wanted to increase their protein intake, and argue that a high-protein label lets a brand charge a higher price. Those are the plaintiffs' arguments about why the label is material, not facts a court has accepted.

The serving-size math in plain English

FDA's reference amount for yogurt, the amount people typically eat in one sitting, is 170 grams, according to the complaints. For a multi-serving tub, the plaintiffs say that amount must be converted to a cup measure and rounded. According to a summary of the Lombardo complaint, 170 grams of this yogurt is about two-thirds of a cup, roughly 169 grams, and a serving that size holds about 17.8 grams of protein, which rounds to 18 grams. Chobani's label instead lists 3/4 cup, or 190 grams, with 20 grams of protein. The earlier Knox complaint used a different cup measure but reached the same figure of about 18 grams. These calculations are the plaintiffs' allegations, not findings by a court.

The two serving sizes in dispute (plaintiffs' calculation)
Serving sizeWeightProtein per serving
Chobani's label: 3/4 cup190 grams20 grams
Plaintiffs' version: 2/3 cupabout 169 gramsabout 17.8 grams (rounds to 18)

Who is in the proposed class and who could get paid

The earlier complaints asked the court to certify a nationwide class of people who bought the 32-ounce "20G Protein" tubs, with state subclasses such as New York and Florida in Lombardo. A consolidated amended complaint was filed on Sept. 18, 2026, and we couldn't read it, so the class definition may have changed. No judge has certified any class. Lombardo, as summarized, brings claims under New York's deceptive-practices and false-advertising laws, Florida consumer-protection law and unjust enrichment, and asks the court to order a label change or a reformulation so that a correctly sized serving holds 20 grams.

If a class were certified, or the case settled, buyers of those tubs could be covered. That is a big "if," because many food-labeling suits are dismissed, narrowed or settled before anyone is paid. Nobody can claim money today. There is no settlement fund, no administrator and no claim form, so any website or message offering to file a Chobani claim now is not legitimate. Our guide to spotting settlement scams explains why. The plaintiffs want damages, refunds and a labeling change, but those are requests, not awards.

See what you're owed in 30 secondsOne flat membership. Never a percentage of your payout.
Claim my money

Where the Chobani lawsuits stand

The consumer suits no longer run separately. On Aug. 19, 2026, Judge John G. Koeltl consolidated Knox, Pitre and Rabinowitz under the name In re Chobani Serving Size Litigation, and on Aug. 28, 2026 he appointed a five-firm executive committee to act as interim class counsel. On Sept. 17, 2026, he folded Lombardo into the same case, and the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on Sept. 18, 2026.

Under the Aug. 19 order, Chobani has 45 days after the amended complaint to respond, which works out to Nov. 2, 2026 unless the court changes the schedule. Expect Chobani to answer or ask the judge to dismiss. Danone's separate suit is before the same judge.

The 20G Protein lawsuits against Chobani
CaseCourt and numberFiledStatus
Danone US v. ChobaniS.D.N.Y., 1:26-cv-05037June 15, 2026A rival's suit over the same serving size; not a class action
Knox v. ChobaniS.D.N.Y., 1:26-cv-05093June 16, 2026Lead case of the consolidated litigation
Pitre v. ChobaniS.D.N.Y., 1:26-cv-05759July 7, 2026Consolidated Aug. 19, 2026
Rabinowitz v. ChobaniS.D.N.Y., 1:26-cv-06621Aug. 3, 2026Consolidated Aug. 19, 2026
Lombardo v. ChobaniS.D.N.Y., 1:26-cv-07408Aug. 31, 2026Consolidated Sept. 17, 2026

Don't confuse it with the Chobani Zero Sugar case

If you searched "Chobani lawsuit" because of a sugar story, that is a different case. On July 27, 2026, the Seventh Circuit ruled in Franco v. Chobani that a class action over Chobani Zero Sugar yogurt, which contains allulose, can go forward, accepting the FDA's view that total sugars includes allulose. That case is about a "zero sugar" label, not protein. For the background, read why zero sugar labels are drawing lawsuits and whether allulose is a sugar.

What could happen next

After Chobani responds, food-labeling cases are often fought on whether a reasonable shopper would be misled and on whether federal labeling law blocks state claims. If the case survives, the next steps are evidence-sharing, a ruling on class certification and possibly a settlement. The court's leadership order says settlement talks for the consumer plaintiffs go through the executive committee. That road usually takes years. Our explainers on how a class action works and what happens after certification map each stage.

A second or third lawsuit on the same theory doesn't make the claims stronger. Here it has meant the court handles them together.

How to get notified if it settles

Check the Nutrition Facts on your tub: the lawsuits target the 32-ounce size that lists a 3/4-cup serving, not the single-serve cups. Keep your receipts or retailer order history, since a settlement could ask for them. Watch for official notices and read how to get notified of class action settlements. Owed finds settlements you may qualify for as they open and reminds you before deadlines, but you always submit the claim yourself. Owed Pro is $2 for the first week, then $49 per year — one flat membership. Owed never takes a percentage of any payout. Filing directly with an administrator is free. Browse the settlements directory or open the Chobani entry.

This guide is general information, not legal advice. Courts decide who is in a class and what anyone is paid.

Glossary

Proposed class action
A lawsuit filed on behalf of many people before a judge has agreed the group can proceed together. Until certification, no class exists.
Serving size
The amount of food the label uses to report nutrition. For multi-serving packages, FDA rules tie it to a household measure such as a cup.
Class certification
A judge's ruling that a case can go forward for a whole group. It comes before any class-wide settlement or trial.
Consolidation
Combining overlapping cases so one judge handles them together, usually to save time and avoid conflicting rulings.
Interim class counsel
Lawyers a judge picks to lead the plaintiffs' side before a class is certified, so one team speaks for everyone.

FAQ

No. The Chobani lawsuits over 20G Protein yogurt are still at an early stage, with no settlement, fund, administrator or claim form. Any site offering a Chobani claim now should be treated as a scam.

Buyers say the 32-ounce tubs give about 18 grams of protein per serving, not 20, because Chobani declares an inflated serving size. Chobani hasn't been found liable.

Jamie Lombardo and Alexander Mercado filed it in federal court in the Southern District of New York on Aug. 31, 2026. On Sept. 17, 2026, Judge John G. Koeltl consolidated it with In re Chobani Serving Size Litigation.

No. The Zero Sugar case, which the Seventh Circuit revived on July 27, 2026, is about allulose and a sugar-free label. The 20G Protein suits are about serving size.

Not now. Money is only possible if a class is certified or the case settles, and many such cases end without a payout.

It's a good idea for the 32-ounce 20G Protein tubs, because a settlement could ask for proof of purchase.

Sources & further reading

This article is based on public information as of Oct 22, 2026; features, prices and deadlines change. Owed is not a law firm and nothing here is legal, tax or financial advice. Corrections →

Keep reading

★★★★★ 4.9 · 12,400+ reviews Get the money you're owed with Owed Get started
Saved